Candy are you losing your marbles??
Candy are you losing your marbles??
That's the curse of Archa
Why didn't they leave an inscription in hieroglyphics? These were certainly available when the Giza pyramids were built.Yes I see where your coming from but ,
Shades of Immanuel Velikovsky and Erik von Daniken!
Why didn't they leave an inscription in hieroglyphics? These were certainly available when the Giza pyramids were built.Yes I see where your coming from but ,
Shades of Immanuel Velikovsky and Erik von Daniken!
a) There is also no hieroglyphics telling us who built them just an assumption that they were built at the same time as the sphinx was carved ( which has a whole other road to travel) hence It is generally accepted that the Sphinx was built about 2500 BC by Pharaoh Khafra only because it has a slight resemblance to other carving of him wearing a headdress .No recorded text that he built it.
b) The pyramids were built before hieroglyphics
c)We only cracked the code of hieroglyphics 100 years ago with the help of the Rosetta stone and that was luck. perhaps they used the only language they knew would still exist in the future. Maths, science and astronomy.
Not going with this one then Issanbirder?Why didn't they leave an inscription in hieroglyphics? These were certainly available when the Giza pyramids were built.Yes I see where your coming from but ,
Shades of Immanuel Velikovsky and Erik von Daniken!
a) There is also no hieroglyphics telling us who built them just an assumption that they were built at the same time as the sphinx was carved ( which has a whole other road to travel) hence It is generally accepted that the Sphinx was built about 2500 BC by Pharaoh Khafra only because it has a slight resemblance to other carving of him wearing a headdress .No recorded text that he built it.
b) The pyramids were built before hieroglyphics
c)We only cracked the code of hieroglyphics 100 years ago with the help of the Rosetta stone and that was luck. perhaps they used the only language they knew would still exist in the future. Maths, science and astronomy.
1. The earliest hieroglyphics are pre-dynastic.
2. There's plenty of archaeological evidence that the whole Giza pyramid complex, including the Sphinx, was built by Fourth Dynasty Pharaohs (2600-2500 B.C.)
3. The date when hieroglyphics were deciphered (by luck, indeed) was about 1830.... but has
nothing whatsoever to do with the meaning, or otherwise, of the pyramids.
This is a classic case of a theory being created first, and evidence supposedly to support it being subsequently adduced from all over the place; anything which can be made to fit is accepted, anything which won 't is quietly laid aside.
There is no evidence that Atlantis was ever more than a fable; where was it?
There is no evidence that 'flying saucers have landed', though many people would like to claim they have seen them.
The mathematical and scientific skills which you attribute to the pyramid-builders existed without a complex writing-system? Pull the other one, Jon.
But all the theorising is fun, so long as you don't take it too seriously. Come 20.12, you can have a good laugh at me if I'm wrong!
I forgot Issanbrider I've have read Defoe and OK after a while you fall into sync with it but our language changes alot even in 300 years no?
Thats it now no more debating I want us all to just agree with me, only joking hopefully see in the winter
jon